One group of undergraduates responded under a fixedratio (FR) 25 schedule and a second group responded under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) 5-s schedule (first history phase). Both groups of subjects were then exposed to a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior (DRO) 5-s schedule (second history phase), and finally to fixed-interval (FI) 5-s (Experiment 1), variable-interval (VI) 5-s (Experiment 2), extinction, FR, and DRL (Experiment 3) schedules (history testing phase). Response rates under the extinction and the FR schedule in the history-testing phase were higher for subjects with a history of the FR schedule than for subjects with a DRL history. Such a systematic difference by remote histories was not observed when the FI, VI, and DRL schedules were in effect during testing.
"An Exploration of Remote History Effects in Humans,"
The Psychological Record: Vol. 57
, Article 6.
Available at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/tpr/vol57/iss2/6